Consumers expect consistency from snack foods, baked goods, breaded meat products, and other processed foods. Many of these products enter a complex series of automated steps where machines interact with the product throughout the process.
For example, many processed food products have ingredients applied outside the product, including seeds, chocolate chips, glazes, colored seasonings, and others. Additionally, some products may have branded designs, logos, and other cosmetic features stamped onto the product at certain stages of their process.
Food processing machines are calibrated and frequently checked to ensure they are performing their specific application consistently. Overtime and for various reasons, these machines can clog, run out of alignment, or over-apply ingredients, resulting in an out-of-spec product.
In food production operations that produce thousands of products daily, many rely on manual product inspection before packaging. However, since manual inspection is highly subjective and operator-dependent, it may be challenging to detect the warning signs of an issue in the production process. It usually is not until a production run is too far to notice these variations and adjust, leading to wasted product or worse.
A Seemingly Minor Insignificance Prompts a Process Malfunction
One cupcake producer experienced how a little visual defect could signal a critical problem in the production process. After baking, each cupcake receives a layer of chocolate frosting over the top, followed by a series of icing swirls applied by a mechanical icing applicator. The position and thickness of the icing is important for brand standards.
As part of the company’s quality control protocol, once every hour of their shift, a quality assurance specialist is required to hand-pick 10 cupcakes from the production line to inspect for product specifications. Along with the size, shape, and color of the overall cupcake, they must also examine the position, sequence, and thickness of the icing swirl.
On this day, one QA operator failed to recognize that the icing swirl began to display subtle inconsistencies from one hour to the next. He ensured that the number of swirls on each cupcake was the proper amount but did not notice that the applied icing was slightly thinner from one hour to the next. The swirls also began to move closer to one side of the cupcake instead of down the middle.
Hour 1 Icing is symmetrical, centered, and at the ideal thickness
Icing is slightly misaligned and thin in spots. Some spattering from the malfunctioning applicator appears.
Icing is thin and inconsistent, missing coverage due to misalignment. Even more spattering appears.
While the production issue begins minor, without an objective method to detect these variations, the cupcake producer gradually found themselves in a quality crisis.
Furthermore, upon completing his shift for the day, he neglected to share these findings with the next shift’s QA operator.
After only minutes in the next shift, the icing applicator began running completely out of spec, leading to a total shutdown of production and several wasted cupcakes and ingredients. Because the previous QA operator was not keen enough to notice these gradual subtleties from unit to unit, the result was a critical error that could have been avoided with a simple mechanical adjustment on the machine.
Sights Set on a Better Way to Proactively Detect Difficult-to-Measure Production Flaws
Their search led them to the TheiaVu™ Compact Vision Inspection System, a benchtop unit designed for at-line analysis of products. The user places a product sample on the TheiaVu™ conveyor, which submits the product to a selection of high-speed cameras, a laser, and imaging software to analyze the product's visual features. In seconds, the TheiaVu™ presents a complete report on the product’s size, shape, and color, as well as detailed measurements on topping coverage, crumb analysis, and more.
Since the icing appearance is such an important feature of their cupcake, with the help of KPM Analytics, the company programmed a custom 2D & 3D TheiaVu™ measurement to ensure ideal swirl placement, sequence, and thickness. As an additional benefit, the TheiaVu™ became a vital process control instrument to identify any mechanical flaws in their production equipment, whether the icing applicator or elsewhere.
With its quality assurance team armed with this objective data, the company has improved quality and reduced waste, allowing them to produce more cupcakes per shift.
Are you interested in learning more about the TheiaVu™ Compact Vision Inspection System for production process control? Contact us today!